HHVBP (Home Health Value-Based Purchasing)

Home Health Value-Based Purchasing (HHVBP) is a CMS model that adjusts Medicare fee-for-service payments to home health agencies based on quality performance, with adjustments of up to plus or minus 5%. The expanded model has applied to all Medicare-certified home health agencies nationwide since January 2023, and the first payment adjustments took effect in CY2025.

How the expanded HHVBP model works

Every Medicare-certified home health agency competes within a cohort based on beneficiary volume, so smaller agencies are compared against similarly sized peers. CMS scores each agency on a defined measure set, awarding points per measure for either achievement against national standards or improvement over the agency's own baseline, whichever is higher. Those points roll up into a Total Performance Score (TPS), which determines the payment adjustment. Performance lags payment by two years: CY2024 performance drives CY2026 payment adjustments, and CY2026 performance drives CY2028 adjustments. The adjustment applies to every Medicare fee-for-service home health payment the agency receives during the payment year.

The CY2026 measure set

CMS rebalanced the measure set for the CY2026 performance year into three weighted categories:

  • OASIS-based measures: 40% of the TPS, including new bathing and dressing function measures
  • Claims-based measures: 40%, including the new Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary Post-Acute Care (MSPB-PAC) measure alongside hospitalization and discharge-to-community measures
  • HHCAHPS survey measures: 20%, with only two measures remaining, Overall Rating of Care and Willingness to Recommend, weighted 10% each

The practical takeaway: OASIS documentation accuracy and claims-driven utilization outcomes now carry 80% of the score, and cost efficiency enters the model through MSPB-PAC for the first time.

What a 5% swing means for margins

The adjustment range is wide relative to typical agency margins. An agency with $5 million in annual Medicare fee-for-service revenue faces up to a $250,000 upside or downside, a half-million-dollar spread between top and bottom performers. That swing lands on top of baseline rate pressure: the CY2026 home health final rule cut aggregate Medicare payments an estimated 1.3%. For many agencies, HHVBP performance is now the difference between a sustainable Medicare book and a losing one. Because of the two-year lag, an agency that waits until it sees a penalty to react is already locked into two more performance years of results.

How to compete under HHVBP

High performers treat HHVBP as an operating system, not a report to review annually:

  • Audit OASIS accuracy at start of care, resumption of care, and discharge, since inaccurate baselines suppress measured improvement
  • Target avoidable hospitalizations and observation stays with risk stratification and front-loaded visits
  • Work HHCAHPS drivers such as communication and care coordination, since only two survey measures now carry the full 20%
  • Review Interim Performance Reports in iQIES quarterly and assign owners to each measure
  • Fold measure-level goals into the agency's QAPI program

Frequently asked questions

When do HHVBP payment adjustments take effect?

The first adjustments were applied to Medicare payments in CY2025 based on CY2023 performance. The model runs on a two-year lag, so CY2026 payments reflect CY2024 performance, and the CY2026 performance year will set CY2028 adjustments.

Which agencies are subject to HHVBP?

All Medicare-certified home health agencies in all 50 states, territories, and DC are in the expanded model. There is no opt-out. Agencies are grouped into larger-volume and smaller-volume cohorts so comparisons happen among similar peers, and new agencies are scored once they have sufficient data.

Can a smaller or lower-scoring agency still earn a positive adjustment?

Yes. Each measure is scored on the higher of achievement or improvement points, so an agency that improves meaningfully against its own baseline can earn credit even if it has not yet reached national benchmark levels. Improvement points cap slightly below achievement points, so sustained high performance ultimately scores best.

Related terms